|
MGG: The BN policy of racial disintegration By M.G.G. Pillai 3/2/2002 11:28 am Sun |
The National Front (BN), at its meeting last week, would not
admit three political parties into its fold. No reasons given,
as it need not, but the three parties were Indian, and rejected
because the MIC, THE Indian party in the BN objected. The three
parties are the Indian Progressive Front, the Punjabi Party of
Malaysia, and the Congress of Indian Muslims of Malaysia (KIMMA).
The People's Progressive Party (PPP), who could not persuade the
IPF to self-destruct in it, now hopes the PPM would. KIMMA
wanted to be in the BN long before the other two parties were
formed. No doubt the BN council had a good laugh over these
perennial no-hopers, but it reflects a larger malaise.
UMNO and its partners in the Alliance and, later, the BN, in
power since 1955, has lost its way in the 46 years since. What
started off as a coalition of three political parties,
representing the three major races, is now an unwieldy grouping
of 14 political parties. The three parties should have been
added by two more when Sarawak and Sabah joined it, but UMNO in
its wisdowm allowed individual members of the alliance in Sabah
and Sarawak to join. It had to be increased when UMNO lost
ground after the May 13 racial riots in 1969. Then the Chinese
and Indian parties, the MCA and MIC, in their arrogance, split
their respective communities. The smaller the party the more
severe the split. So, it is not surprising that the Indians are
divided so many ways, on racial, linguistic, regional grounds.
The MIC insists on Tamil as the only Indian language, and this
led to the Indian minorities to seek refuge in their own language
and community. The MIC's refusal to consider any communities
other than the Tamils led to the Northern Indians disaffected,
and fractured into more communities than there are fingers in
your hand. This was missed when the BN rejected the trio of parties as
members. UMNO and the BN has given up its independence promise
of racial and political integration. Instead, the country is
fractured into myriads of groups of every conceivable definition:
racial, religious, regional, linguistic, cultural, and under a
Malay and Muslim hegemony. The country veers irrevocably to a
Malay existence, with the non-Malays allowed to stay on
sufferance. The civil service is so Malay- and Islamic-oriented
that a small group of Malay and Islamic ayatollahs force-feed it.
No one dare challenge them, and a newly appointed officer curries
their favour by making sure he leaves his office more Islamic and
Malay than when he took it. He does this often against
opposition from his officers, but steamrolls it through, often
without discussion, and presents them with a fait accompli. No
one at this stage dare reverse it. Secretaries-general are
frightened of them, and is helpless at this unsanctioned
practice. There is a "glass ceiling" beyond which a non-Malay
officer cannot aspire to, and applies to every ministry and
office. It is roughly equivalent to the rank of major general in
the army. And it is no more than one of two in every ministry.
The non-Malay political parties have given up the ghost.
They should have raised it at a political level but did not.
Their leaders decide to ignore their communities, and bask in
this short-term glory of Uncle Toms, unwilling to rock the boat
and happy they survive. So much so the communities are divided
irrevocably into a political wing with no power in office and all
but ignored by its more powerful cultural wing. This is so in
all three communities and their political parties -- Malays,
Chinese, Indians and UMNO, MCA and MIC. In all three
communities, their political party presidents led both the
community's political and cultural wings. That is no so. The
cultural wing is at odds with the political. The conflicts
within the communities is a sign of that. This would continue
with a vengeance in a leaderless vaccuum. The cultural wing
would form their own political parties and come to terms with,
now, the BN; but if the BN loses its hold, than with any other
group that fills its place. Political power in the BN is personal to holder, who clings
to it to the exclusion of power for the community they represent.
So, what UMNO wants, the BN parties go along. The ease with
which civil servants can persuade the non-Malay party members in
state assemblies and local councils to act against their
community is a sign more serious than is admitted. They ignore
time-honoured government rules which forbid, for instance, the
wanton changing of road names with a history behind it. So,
Jalan Koo Chong Kong in Ipoh is renamed, for no rhyme or reason,
Jalan Tabung Haji; Batu Caves in Selangor Selayang. The Kuala
Lumpur City Council arbitrarily raises the licence fees for dogs
five times to RM50, and the number of dogs one can keep depends
on where you stay. (But for two years, the dogs wear no dog
tags: they were ordered too late and arrived well after the
licences had been issued. But that is another story.)
What happens then is a country that has lost its way, with
non-political groups growing so important that they dominate in
secret. The BN does not know if it comes or goes. This is
reflected in how it governs. The individual party leaders have
only one aim: to shut out challengers. Many cannot face the
communities they represent in cabinet. And the communities split
into political and communal groups. No one in office is
bothered. All are frightened and worry about the headlong clash
between UMNO and PAS for the Malay Muslim heartland that a new
star, Keadilan, threatens to mop up those Malays who believe
politics is best left not to religious leaders. There is no
corresponding option for the Chinese and Malays. This is
reflected in the number of Chinese and Indian political parties,
however insignificant they are, wanting to be members of the BN.
That they do is what frightens, but UMNO and the BN is, as
always, unconcerned on what they had wrought on the body politic
through the years. M.G.G. Pillai |