Laman Webantu KM2: 6580 File Size: 3.6 Kb * |
MGG: Quo Vadis, IWK? By M.G.G. Pillai 9/1/2002 10:26 pm Wed |
The Indah Water Konsortium, to which was privatised the right to
operate the country's sewage systems, is back in the news. The
two Establishment cronies who operated it in succession racked up
losses so high and without a system to operate it that the
government took it over. Now a third group, in which a former
cabinet minister, Tan Sri Megat Junid Megat Ayob, is the key
crony, is given a letter of intent; but it also has a former
Anwar Ibrahim comrade-in-arms suggests other political
developments though he has nothing to do with the mess this new
group is ladled with. Two failures, and one more in the offing.
All was set, and the government was to have announced it. But it
cannot. The cabinet suddenly got an attack of clarity and
integrity and desired know from those who made the decision why
they believed that after two failures, this would succeed. And
getting no answers, it refused to approve. Those who thought it
would provide them with million-ringgit Mercedes Benzes and BMWs
must now wait longer. IWK was set up to fail. The aim was for whoever controlled
it to make lots of money, not to provide an efficient sewage
service. It still does not have a system to collect sewage rates
from houseowners and businesses. It had a payment rate that made
one pay more for sewage than water. It was a ripoff. It was
blatant. It insisted, with no basis in law, a privatised
municipal function has municipal law behind it and forced down
one's throat. It sends bills, and follows that with thugs and
bill collectors, frightening wives to pay up on threats of worse.
It does not even know who its "customers" are. I have received
three bills in the last eight years, since IWK was formed in
1994, in three different names, none of which mine, and the last
bill showed that to be RM192. I asked each time to let me look
at the contract I signed, told each time I must pay, even without
a contract. I told them I would not, and sue me in court. They
did a lawyer of my acquaintance, and when he asked for
particulars, they wisely withdrew. In any case, how am I a
defaulter. The government is put on notice because its cronies saw only
the money they could make of this privatisation, not the service
it was to provide. And that the houseowners are cannon fodder
for their greed. But the worm turned. This highway robbery was
seen for what it was, and political problems intruded into the
Malaysian conscience after one man was forced to remove his
residence from Damansara Heights to Sungei Buloh prison. The new
consortium now wants a government guarantee that people would pay
the rates. In other words, it wants a free ride. It would not
individual contracts with its "customers" as it must, but it
wants government guarantees they would pay as it demands. The
government is caught in a cleft stick. Because it allowed the
highway robbery, it is forced to come to terms with the resulting
bad debts. The papers reported that its debts mount and insist
its "customers" owe them hundreds of millions of ringgit. They
do not explain why it did not collect the dues, and it now talks
of legal action to recover it. In other words, nothing has
changed, the losses would continue, and the government would have
to bail it out again in this latest privatisation.
M.G.G. Pillai |